Solid flywheel VS DMF

Discuss, ask, or get help with engine and mechanical queries in here.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
supafrisk
Horse Whipper
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:22 am

Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by supafrisk »

As most of you know, I was debating the issue months ago and as others will know my clutch had started slipping although I was hoping to get it to over 226,000 on the original clutch. However, losing 3rd gear synchro made a new clutch whilst fitting the new box more financially viable than putting the old one in, so we decided to give a solid conversion a go.
What a MAHOOSIVE difference, the clutch is so light you could practically blow on it and it would change - I fully recommend it.
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by Doggy »

Do you notice any more drivetrain vibration or 'lumpiness' since doing the solid flywheel swap, Supa?
Last edited by Doggy on Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
adam03031980
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:53 pm
Location: deeping st james

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by adam03031980 »

I spoke to a citroen / peugeot garage and he said he fits solid convesions to all pug and citroens that he changes clutches on with the DMF and said he's never had a problem
User avatar
supafrisk
Horse Whipper
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:22 am

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by supafrisk »

dogslife wrote:Do you notice any more drivetrain vibration or 'lumpiness' since doing the solid flywheel swap, Supa?
None whatsoever, even the mechanics were impressed, I cannot begin to describe to you how light it is :cheesy:
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by Welly »

supafrisk wrote:I cannot begin to describe to you how light it is :cheesy:

Well I'd like you to try, I've got all day :D
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
legoless
1.8 16v
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:01 am
Location: London

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by legoless »

Where did you get the conversion from Supafrisk?
I am looking at get my 110 remapped and the dmf is already squeaking so am looking at finally silencing the bugger
cheers Al
totaleclipse
2.0 16v
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:52 pm
Location: Kilmarnock, Ayrshire

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by totaleclipse »

did a clutch on a 406 with a DMF about 5 days ago, and i have to say, it wasn't very nice to drive at all compaired to mine, was actually starting to wonder if i'd screwed somthing up, but the owner said it felt perfect, so must have been right enough.
1997 2.1TD executive estate - mmmm, lovely :)
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Solid flywheel VS DMF

Post by mjb »

A lot of owners don't actually know what "perfect" means when it comes to 406s... The guy I bought my dad's tubby off thought it ran perfectly despite completely bu**ered clutch hydraulics and a lack of any turbo boost

There's a presumption that because they bought a car for £100, it must have been awful out of the factory... But with the 406 that's just not true though - it was an executive rep-mobile, at the top of its class. It's just a lot of cars have been left to degrade in a really bad way
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
Post Reply