Page 1 of 1

ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:12 pm
by Sonia406
Well I have been sorting and cleaning the car out and notice that I have 2 protruding bolts coming through the middle of the rear row seats.
A little hard to explain so I have taken pictures.
I presume that since either side I have black covers that I am missing the same for the middle too?
If anyone has a picture of theirs I would like to see it please, just for being noseys sake, do they all measure the same measurements?
What would be the technical term for these?
I came up with 'rear row retaining bolt covers' the trick to this technical lark is to just add 'retaining' and 'bolt' cos usually it pays off :supafrisk: :lol:

It probably seems a really silly thing to do to replace them, but why not? I want to look after my car, I want to replace the LX badge on the near side and - this is just another of those jobs where something is missing and I simply will not rest until she's looking as perfect as she did when she left that factory :lol: :oops:
Maybe a bit extreme but I just want her looking spick and spam, no parts missing or broken...........

Pictures~
(Excuse the dirt - it's a work in progress, see her thread in pictures section!)

Image

Image

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:16 pm
by lozz
iirc the last 406 est ihad the rear seat (base) split 50/50
Might be just missing some plastic covers there,

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:46 pm
by Sonia406
lozz wrote:iirc the last 406 est ihad the rear seat (base) split 50/50
Might be just missing some plastic covers there,
What does iirc mean? You keep putting it and I never know :oops: :lol:
I looked at some pictures earlier on the KB and when you fold the seats down, they are like the hinge covers? Looks so untidy with them missing :lol:

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:51 pm
by jonsowman
Sonia406 wrote:
lozz wrote:iirc the last 406 est ihad the rear seat (base) split 50/50
Might be just missing some plastic covers there,
What does iirc mean? You keep putting it and I never know :oops: :lol:
If I recall correctly :D

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:10 am
by Sonia406
jonsowman wrote:
Sonia406 wrote:
lozz wrote:iirc the last 406 est ihad the rear seat (base) split 50/50
Might be just missing some plastic covers there,
What does iirc mean? You keep putting it and I never know :oops: :lol:
If I recall correctly :D
Thanks :oops: Never heard that one before :lol:

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:51 am
by steve_earwig
lozz wrote:iirc the last 406 est ihad the rear seat (base) split 50/50
60/40. Looks like Sonia's doesn't split (did they come like that?) so doesn't need the middle two hinges.

Just checked Service Box and yep, they sure did :shock: Before you rush down the breaker's, I can count the times I've found a split folding rear seat indispensable I can count on the fingers of one, erm, foot.

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:08 am
by DaiRees
steve_earwig wrote:Before you rush down the breaker's, I can count the times I've found a split folding rear seat indispensable I can count on the fingers of one, erm, foot.
Try going to Ikea with the wife and 2 tea pot lids... :wink:

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:33 am
by steve_earwig
No teapot lids - no tea pots :P Although there was that time I took the D9's old interior to Mr Waue with t' wife and t' mate in the back...

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:24 am
by Busman
I think that the non splitting rear seat is a 7 seat feature. Well, at least my 7 seater is the same.

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:44 pm
by waue1978
Busman wrote:I think that the non splitting rear seat is a 7 seat feature. Well, at least my 7 seater is the same.
That's exactly right. Mine was the same & if you check the handbook, there is actually a warning not to remove the backrest from Family versions, but not sure why. Those 2 protruding bolts are where a split seat base mounts & if you look under the boot carpet close to the backrest, you'll find plastic plugs where the holes for the split backrest mountings go.

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:15 pm
by Sonia406
waue1978 wrote:
Busman wrote:I think that the non splitting rear seat is a 7 seat feature. Well, at least my 7 seater is the same.
That's exactly right. Mine was the same & if you check the handbook, there is actually a warning not to remove the backrest from Family versions, but not sure why. Those 2 protruding bolts are where a split seat base mounts & if you look under the boot carpet close to the backrest, you'll find plastic plugs where the holes for the split backrest mountings go.
My rear row seats definitely fold flat. I found the buttons after I first bought the car, curiosity got the better of me :lol:
I shall take pictures tomorrow to prove the point, I know for 99.9% sure they move, as I say, the buttons are flush into the seat tops until you press them then when seat not engaged you have a RED thing to tell you it's not engaged properly.
Never had to fold it, having to fit 3 car seats 'n all but I know they definitely fold.

So you think the covers should be in under the carpet in the boot? I shall have a look - thanks :)

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:49 am
by Sonia406
Boys, Now I understand what you mean by not a split seat......... I thought you meant it couldn't be folded :oops:

You live and learn peeps - or if you're just me, you just live :lol:

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:29 pm
by Busman
One of lifes secrets is to learn as you go along.
I shall inspect the rear of my 7 seat flying machine apon its return from where ever it has flown off to.

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:07 pm
by Busman
Just checked. In the middle, unused, position there is just a bare stud sticking out. A dome nut could be fitted perhaps?

Re: ESTATE OWNERS: Rear row question

Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:23 pm
by Sonia406
Busman wrote:Just checked. In the middle, unused, position there is just a bare stud sticking out. A dome nut could be fitted perhaps?
Thanks for that............. Seems strange we all have this exposed.......... :shock: