Insurance costs 90 v 110

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

ToddM
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:06 pm

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by ToddM »

dogslife wrote:
Bailes1992 wrote:
dogslife wrote:HDi 110 / 136 = 31mph/1000 ~ 2250 RPM @ 70 mph 8)
Thats goto be great for long distance driving! Only 250rpm less than the HDi90 but bet it makes a difference!
It does - my previous Xsara HDi 90 had the lower ratio & used to drone a bit at anything much over 75.

31 mph/1000 feels too low on mine - I keep trying to change up when I'm not concentrating properly. :oops:

So far, no one's dumped an unwanted ML6 in my garden. :roll:
Normal with that kind of powerhouse though, doggy! :twisted:
Captain Jack wrote:On a serious note, I managed to get my knob off after some persuasive yanking. Then used some epoxy to put the new one on. Glue still setting now so haven't had the chance to test it.
steve_earwig wrote:Ooh-er mrs. :shock:
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by gumby6371 »

So the general concensus is go for the 110 if you can?

I've got to say having driven a 110, even with knackered mounts/drop links and getting used to the high bite on the clutch it was a lot of fun to drive and that extra torque when overtaking made it much less stressful on the roads. Insurance for me is an extra £50 for the HDI 90 and an extra £65 for the HDI 110 so as far as tax/insurance/fuel cost go it's a no brainer it was the maintenance costs that had me scratching my head.
Just need to get christmas out of the way and convince the good lady I need something newer :cheesy:
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by sirwiggum »

Heavy clutch and knackered mounts were a nightmare last winter, stuck in the cold in xmas shopping traffic for hour and a half.
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
Catflem
2.0 16v
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by Catflem »

Bailes1992 wrote:
DiscoPol wrote:
sirwiggum wrote:was supposed to have drums instead of discs at the rear
Bailes1992 wrote:Both 90 and 110 have rear discs.
my 90 had drums at the back
My Uncle's 90's got discs! Was adjusting the handbreak last week :)
So does my Rapier 90.

I've never driven a 110, but the 90 is underpowered if you need to put your foot down to overtake slow moving vehicles.

If you live in a town or do motorway driving then it would be fine, but in the countryside with twisty roads and overtaking opportunities few and far between, it can be a liability.
User avatar
waue1978
HDi don't believe it!
Posts: 2341
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Andover, Hampshire

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by waue1978 »

If you plan on doing lots of overtaking like that, you're better off with a 2.2 as the 110 isn't exactly super-quick. That quirk of going a bit flat over 3000rpm can put a bit of a dampener on most plans for single-carriageway overtaking.
2000/X Peugeot 406 110 HDi LX Family 93k to 2000/W BMW 530D SE Auto 84k to 2003/03 Peugeot Partner Hdi Escapade 98k to 2003/53 Vauxhall Zafira DTi Elegance 74k

Image
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Insurance costs 90 v 110

Post by sirwiggum »

My 90 had discs with drums in the middle.

Had enough power for town and the odd jaunt to the countryside.

Overtaking was never too bad, drop down a gear and get it in the right rev range, and take off. 3rd gear is especially good.
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
Post Reply