Gary406 wrote:go for the HDi 110 if you can. still a brilliant car . with a lot more pull....
Even with 211k, a dodgy sounding knock/clunk when idling and a toggle switch for the rad fan
Moderator: Moderators
Gary406 wrote:go for the HDi 110 if you can. still a brilliant car . with a lot more pull....
go for another 110 ?? theres hundreds about ... when i change car i will be getting hdi 110 .. .Stu63 wrote:Gary406 wrote:go for the HDi 110 if you can. still a brilliant car . with a lot more pull....
Even with 211k, a dodgy sounding knock/clunk when idling and a toggle switch for the rad fan
Not harder to work onsteve_earwig wrote:On the downside the engine is harder to work on and they stopped making them in 1998. I'd still have another one thoughThe HDi might have the same number of horses on paper by the reality feels much different...
2.1TD and a 1.9TD are the same basic engine with a slightly different head.steve_earwig wrote:You've not owned one have you. I presume you have a Haynes from your 1.9, open it up & have a squint at how many things you have to take the engine out to get to on a 2.1td. Inlet manifold (engine out), exhaust manifold (engine out), cylinder head (engine out) - it's a big old lump you know!
Whatevvarrrrrrrrrr.Bailes1992 wrote:Have it infront of me.
But like a said, just cause haynes says so, dosen't make it true!
Had my head off twice and didn't even have to touch the engine mounts!
steve_earwig wrote:Hold on, let's recap:
You're looking at 2 HDis now:
Contestant number one has the right miles for the age, not much service history and seems to run & drive ok. Price 900 notes.
Contestant number two has a lot of miles, a bit more history, drives ok but sounds like a bucket of nails and there's evidence of some skullbodgery. Price 650.
I'd steer clear of the high miler, the noise might be something simple, or it might be a disaster and, judging by the switch, the owner is a bit reluctant to get the old wallet out and there's always the possibility it's being punted out before it goes bang. Give the other one a good look over, look at stuff like pedal rubbers, trim, stone chips on the bonnet (smell a rat if there's none at all) - stuff that doesn't usually wear out & get replaced. Do the MOT thing, that sounds like a plan.
Sorry, I was thinking about thisStu63 wrote:It's not that #1 has "not much history"....it's not got any, he said he didnt have it
Which does tie-in with the present mileage, albeit perhaps little too conveniently... I've bought a few cars with no history, it could mean all sorts of things, not necessarily bad but the downside is you don't know how old the cam belt is.Stu63 wrote:I did a check but the mileage can only be verfied up to 02 and was 45k
I'm still thinking these are 110bhp, in which case they have dual mass flywheels (a nuisance on many cars) which should be changed with the clutch, and the labour time on them is something mad like 10 hour, which would probably put this one "beyond economical repair".Stu63 wrote: I forgot to mention that the seller was honest enough to say it needs a clutch
Not "don't", it's "might not". I've seen a number of cars that have had a 6 digit number (hey, I don't look at overpriced carssteve_earwig wrote:I've bought a few cars with no history, it could mean all sorts of things, not necessarily bad but the downside is you don't know how old the cam belt is.