Outside Lane Hoggers

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
plod
3.0 24v
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Hinckley

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by plod »

gumby6371 wrote: Similarly you can not accelerate until you pass the next sign signalling an increase in the legal limit.
I disagree

It's 24 years since I past my test, but I remember on one of my lessons, the instructer asking me what I was doing as we approached a 60 sign whilst in a 30, as I remained at 30, and he said you were allowed to increase your speed so you were up to speed when you reached the sign
1999 D8.5 HDi GLX - Sold :(

2007 Mondingo Zetec - I seek forgiveness :( Bring back my 406
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by mjb »

Wrong.

The speed limit sign marks the beginning of a speed limit as delimited by a line passing the speed limit signs on either side of the road*, not the beginning of some magic grace period. Why do you think there's so many GATSOs mounted immediately after a speed limit reduction?

You are required to brake BEFORE a sign reducing the speed limit. If the sign is not placed in accordance with the legal guidelines to allow this (such as dropping the speed limit from NSL to 30mph on the exit of a tight bend with no prior warnings like "30mph in 100yds") then you have broken the law but you have good grounds to contest a speeding ticket. If it is a properly placed and visible sign and you get done for 31mph in a 30mph area a foot past the sign then you have no recourse.

Similarly you can get done for doing 31mph in a 30mph area inches before an NSL sign or on a motorway slip road before the blue motorway sign if there happens to be an arsehole in a scamera van nearby

If you care to disagree, please find the law which allows a grace period first.

* The exception to this is where a junction is concerned, in which case the demarcation point is the white line dividing the roads
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by Welly »

You are certainly spot-on there m but I was kinda saying that in general day-to-day motoring we don't really need to correct the speed immediately just so long as it is done reasonably, of course if you were to fall foul of a speed trap then you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Usually the change in speed restriction is done well before the 'hazard' so gives this 'transition time' I spoke about but purely in my own opinion.

I understood the law on speeding was an 'allowance' of +10%, + 2mph so 30 would be 35+ and 60 would be 68+ and so on.

Anyway, what about drivers who almost slam into the back of you when you creep over a speed bump so as not to damage your motor :roll:
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
leestudd30
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:43 am
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by leestudd30 »

When it comes to 31 in a 30, are car speedos really that accurate? I always thought that the filth have calibrated speedos so they are always accurate, but surely production cars and older ones aren't as accurate as the police?
1997 2 litre GLX 4dr now dead!
2005 Citroen Xsara Picasso Desire HDi
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by mjb »

Welly wrote:I understood the law on speeding was an 'allowance' of +10%, + 2mph
Almost certain it's not law, just police guidelines for who to prosecute, and I've got a feeling it's 5%+2mph
leestudd30 wrote:When it comes to 31 in a 30, are car speedos really that accurate? I always thought that the filth have calibrated speedos so they are always accurate, but surely production cars and older ones aren't as accurate as the police?
As far as I'm aware (haven't read the law on this one), cars deemed fit for UK roads are not permitted to have speedos which read less than the actual speed, or more than 10% more. Most manufacturers aim for over-reading by about 5% to account for production tolerances and tyre wear.

This means if your speedo says 30mph and your car is legal, then you will be doing anywhere between 27mph and 30mph.
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by gumby6371 »

I would have to agree with speedos reading over, I've used different sat navs in several cars and the sat nav speedo always read under the cars speedometer by 2 or 3 miles an hour. In theory (unless you've done some major mods) if the needle is pointing at the correct notch on your speedo you should be just under the legally allowable maximum speed.
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
User avatar
waue1978
HDi don't believe it!
Posts: 2341
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Andover, Hampshire

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by waue1978 »

gumby6371 wrote:I would have to agree with speedos reading over, I've used different sat navs in several cars and the sat nav speedo always read under the cars speedometer by 2 or 3 miles an hour. In theory (unless you've done some major mods) if the needle is pointing at the correct notch on your speedo you should be just under the legally allowable maximum speed.
Unless you are driving something fitted with a tachograph which is supposed to be as bang on accurate as the speedo in the police cars.

Has anybody ever looked at the speedo in a police car? I looked at an ex-police ST200 Mondeo & whereas the normal Mondeo speedo has a line every 10 or 5mph (can't rightly remember) the police one had a lot more markings on it.
2000/X Peugeot 406 110 HDi LX Family 93k to 2000/W BMW 530D SE Auto 84k to 2003/03 Peugeot Partner Hdi Escapade 98k to 2003/53 Vauxhall Zafira DTi Elegance 74k

Image
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
Posts: 19813
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by steve_earwig »

I had an ex-police Senator and it had what looked like the standard (analogue) speedo with a calibration sticker on it. I didn't have another to compare it for extra lines or enifink tho...

When I was in GB back in April I was relying on the scat nav to tell me how fast I was going (no mph) and was keeping it bang on the speed limit, overtaking masses of other cars coming round the old M25.
Unskilled meddling sin©e 2007

The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.
User avatar
plod
3.0 24v
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Hinckley

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by plod »

mjb wrote:Wrong.

The speed limit sign marks the beginning of a speed limit as delimited by a line passing the speed limit signs on either side of the road*, not the beginning of some magic grace period. Why do you think there's so many GATSOs mounted immediately after a speed limit reduction?

You are required to brake BEFORE a sign reducing the speed limit. If the sign is not placed in accordance with the legal guidelines to allow this (such as dropping the speed limit from NSL to 30mph on the exit of a tight bend with no prior warnings like "30mph in 100yds") then you have broken the law but you have good grounds to contest a speeding ticket. If it is a properly placed and visible sign and you get done for 31mph in a 30mph area a foot past the sign then you have no recourse.

Similarly you can get done for doing 31mph in a 30mph area inches before an NSL sign or on a motorway slip road before the blue motorway sign if there happens to be an arsehole in a scamera van nearby

If you care to disagree, please find the law which allows a grace period first.

* The exception to this is where a junction is concerned, in which case the demarcation point is the white line dividing the roads
I agree that when slowing down, that where the lower speed limit is idicated, it starts level with the sign
What I was saying, that when the speed increases from a lower limit to a higher, my driving instructer informed me I was in the wrong for waiting till I reached the sign before speeding up

I tried searching for a definitive answer when I posted my first post but couldn't
1999 D8.5 HDi GLX - Sold :(

2007 Mondingo Zetec - I seek forgiveness :( Bring back my 406
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by Doggy »

Now here's a technical conundrum for you....

We've all noted a similar difference between speedo mph & satnav mph and generally the discrepancy 'fits' pretty well with the known inacuracy of yer average speedometer. But I think there's also another possible explanation.

A satnav computes where it is by triangulating the signals from multiple satelites, then integrates speed from the rate of position change. Will this calculation not undersate actual speed if you're travelling in anything other than a perfectly straight line? For that matter, don't you have to be maintaining precisely the same altitude too?


So many questions, so little beer. :roll:
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Outside Lane Hoggers

Post by mjb »

dogslife wrote:A satnav computes where it is by triangulating the signals from multiple satelites, then integrates speed from the rate of position change. Will this calculation not undersate actual speed if you're travelling in anything other than a perfectly straight line?
Yes, but given it happens several times a second, and the speed you see is averaged over the last second or so (and typically only given to 1mph/1kph resolution anyway), it makes very little difference.

High end GPS receivers can calculate your speed up to 100 times per second. Unless you're strapped to a helicopter rotor in flight, the difference between a straight line and the curved path in 0.01s is as good as non-existent.
For that matter, don't you have to be maintaining precisely the same altitude too?
GPS receivers are inherently three-dimensional, although much less accurate when it comes to heights, however if there's a couple of satellites nearby, you should be able to get a reasonably accurate fix. TBH if your altitude is changing enough to impact the speed calculations, and you're focusing on the satnav instead of the road, you have MUCH bigger problems :lol:
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
Post Reply