rwb wrote:kevtherev wrote:is this a goverment funded calculator?
Yes. Well, it's a license fee funded claculator. Although given the Bolly Bolchevik Corporation's left wing bias those results are quite astonishing.
Try these
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/budg ... ct-me.html &
http://www.budget-calculator.co.uk/budg ... ulator.php - If I was back in blighty I'd loose out quite considerable according to the Biassed Broadcasting Company, the torygraf's laughably uncomprehensive calculator has me level-pegging. The no name brand one says I just gain by a few pennies.
You'll have noticed the parade of tubby messy looking women with regional accents the BBC has been parading on the news all saying how they've lost child benefit. But in order to lose child benefit they must be earning over £50k.
That's fairly normal, whenever there's a budget all media not biassed towards the current dictatorship, sorry, government, always parades those who are losing out for the public to gawp at. Also, I don't think it's the threshold that's the problem, it's more completely reorganising the scheme to make it much harder to claim anything and the millions that will be spent on implementing it. According to the torygraf anyway.
Similarly, pensioners haven't lost anything; they simply haven't had an increase in their personal tax allowance. This only affects pensioners with an income of over £9,940. Besides which, with all those free TV licenses and winter fuel payments they're doing quite well out of the sytem.
It's a lot more comprehensive than that, also the treasury forecasts an increase of tax of £3.3bn over 4 years as a result - how do you like them apples grandpa?
kevtherev wrote:...new labour" giveth with this hand taketh twice as much away with the other.
Yep: that's socialism. They will collect in all the money and then decide who they deem to be the most worthy to give it back out to as benefits -- minus of course the cost of running big government.
Because they wasted huge amounts on administrative cock-ups

Which gnu labour is this anyway - Tony "closet tory" Blair or Gordon "couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery" Brown?
kevtherev wrote:Unless your already rich then you'll have even more cash
It's better that these super-rich people are "on the inside of the tent pissing out than the outside pissing in". These people create employment e.g., by buying and decorating big houses which need endless cleaning, being driven round, and even by setting up businesses, and they buy expensive stuff from shops who employ more people. I think that after £1m income should be tax free in order to encourage more of them to live here permenantly and not in tax havens. Someone earning £1m pays £501,381 in tax and NI -- so just how is that much not a "fair share"?
Have you met any rich people? They don't get rich by spending money left, right and centre, they get rich by holding on to it. The rich are, statistically, the least likely to stick their hands in their pockets to help anybody but themselves. Yes they get taxed a shedload, that's one of the reasons they get paid even more shedloads. Anyway, let's face it aint expensive British-made cars they're buying, nor is it holidays to the Costa Del Bognor Regis. The ones I actually feel sorry for are the almost rich - those who get paid just enough to make it into the higher bracket but loosing out as a consequence. My heart truly bleeds
