MOT advisory

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
D9406
2.2 16v
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 2:12 pm
Location: IO81XW

MOT advisory

Post by D9406 »

Just passed mot,third in a row with no issues, and received two advisories.

1. Undertrays fitted obscuring some underside components.
2.Engine covers fitted obscuring some engine bay components.

So what is going to happen when a car with fully enclosed bays go for the mot?

Discuss.
1999 406 HDi 2.0 110 GTX Estate. 48k when bought, now 150K. Second owner, I've covered over 100k in it.
Clutch changed @110k, bottom pulley changed, cam belt changed, EGR blanked, cat removed, front springs changed.
trem1
3.0 24v
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: south shields,tyneside

Re: MOT advisory

Post by trem1 »

yea i get these on my 407, I asked if i should remove them for the following year and was told 'theres no need' :roll:


2004 Iron Grey 407se 136bhp......Written Off
2006 Moonstone blue 407 se 136 bhp.....Written off
2006 silver 407 SW..........replacement
User avatar
lozz
3.0 24v
Posts: 11908
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: where-ever

Re: MOT advisory

Post by lozz »

its a common advisory item now,.
altho iconsider it as just stupid. its away of Mr mot tester saving himself from inspecting brake pipes etc

normaly says something like - Engine cover fitted preventing full inspection of engine blah de blah on the ones ihad.

ithink your mot tester is not very keen :wink:
Last edited by lozz on Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
highlander
PowerFlow Shill
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: MOT advisory

Post by highlander »

Go to a different MOT tester.

God knows what he'd be like after opening the bonnet of this Lexus:
http://www.technologytell.com/in-car-te ... C11014.jpg
2002 (D9) Peugeot 406 Coupe SE, 2.2 litre Petrol. Scarlet Red/Rouge Ecarlate/Rosso Scarlatto. Black Leather interior. SOLD :(
2008 (E60 LCI) BMW 525i M-Sport, 3.0 litre Petrol. Carbonschwarz Metallic. Black Dakota Leather and Myrtlewood interior.
User avatar
lozz
3.0 24v
Posts: 11908
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: where-ever

Re: MOT advisory

Post by lozz »

Theyre not allowed to remove anything.
so what they carnt see they carnt fail.

so iguess by them adding the advisory is there way of a disclaimer ,incase by chance car decides to burst a brake pipe/piss oil out
aday after test.
User avatar
lozz
3.0 24v
Posts: 11908
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: where-ever

Re: MOT advisory

Post by lozz »

User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
Posts: 19813
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: MOT advisory

Post by steve_earwig »

highlander wrote:Go to a different MOT tester.

God knows what he'd be like after opening the bonnet of this Lexus:
http://www.technologytell.com/in-car-te ... C11014.jpg
No user serviceable parts inside :roll: At least it's got a dipstick which I hear aren't making their way into some bimmers now...

Are mot testers still allowed to open doors?
Unskilled meddling sin©e 2007

The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Re: MOT advisory

Post by gumby6371 »

I strongly suspect that under all those engine covers are a family of mice and a large wheel...it gets around new EU emissions regs!!!
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
davew
2.0 16v
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 11:54 pm

Re: MOT advisory

Post by davew »

it's not the mot testers fault they are told they are not allowed to remove covers to check under them.
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
Posts: 19813
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: MOT advisory

Post by steve_earwig »

Nor are they allowed to probe suspicious areas with screwdrivers (ahh, them were the days)
Unskilled meddling sin©e 2007

The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.
User avatar
highlander
PowerFlow Shill
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: MOT advisory

Post by highlander »

davew wrote:it's not the mot testers fault they are told they are not allowed to remove covers to check under them.
If the engine bay is like that from factory, then they shouldn't write this in as an advisory. Either that, or allow them to remove the undertrays to perform the inspections.

Imagine trying to explain that to the person you're selling your car to. Will they really believe you? In my mind, that advisory lowers the value of your car.
2002 (D9) Peugeot 406 Coupe SE, 2.2 litre Petrol. Scarlet Red/Rouge Ecarlate/Rosso Scarlatto. Black Leather interior. SOLD :(
2008 (E60 LCI) BMW 525i M-Sport, 3.0 litre Petrol. Carbonschwarz Metallic. Black Dakota Leather and Myrtlewood interior.
davew
2.0 16v
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 11:54 pm

Re: MOT advisory

Post by davew »

removing engine trays would cause all sorts of problems, half of all engine trays i've seen have missing bolts and fasteners, held on with zip ties ect , the mot testers would then be held accountable if anything goes wrong or they can't get them back on properly.
i agree it's a bit of a problem as there could be a brake pipe under there that is a about to burst and they won't see it.
Post Reply