Personally I've always thought they make driving boring, but .................. I could be tempted with this :-
2000 Peugeot 406 2.0 Executive Auto petrol 47k £1995
Saw it advertised in the stealers not too distant.
Yes
or No 
!!!!!To Buy Or Not To Buy
Moderator: Moderators
To Buy Or Not To Buy
What's the verdict on Automatics? Is there a big difference in the fuel consumption or the reliability?
Personally I've always thought they make driving boring, but .................. I could be tempted with this :-
2000 Peugeot 406 2.0 Executive Auto petrol 47k £1995
Saw it advertised in the stealers not too distant.
Yes or No !!!!!
Personally I've always thought they make driving boring, but .................. I could be tempted with this :-
2000 Peugeot 406 2.0 Executive Auto petrol 47k £1995
Saw it advertised in the stealers not too distant.
Yes
or No !!!!!
-
jameslxdt
- 3.0 24v
- Posts: 2512
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: London, on me bike
- Contact:
AVOID!!
pug autoboxes are awful, depending on how lucky you are they last on average about 60k miles, and in 2.0 form they are woefully slow and MPG is rubbish
do a search there was a discusion about how bad the auto's are
pug autoboxes are awful, depending on how lucky you are they last on average about 60k miles, and in 2.0 form they are woefully slow and MPG is rubbish
do a search there was a discusion about how bad the auto's are
FAQ - 406 D8 petrol (excl. V6) running and starting problemsPeugeot wrote:what are you worried about? we made car that lasted 10 years"..."Zat is very goode non?
Nuff said. One thing I've noticed while looking around, most of the auto's are low mileage ........... coincidence ......... p'rhaps not.jameslxdt wrote:AVOID!!
pug autoboxes are awful, depending on how lucky you are they last on average about 60k miles, and in 2.0 form they are woefully slow and MPG is rubbish
Thanks jameslxdt, I'll [s]try and[/s] will avoid them and look elsewhere.