highlander wrote:Sonia406 wrote:At the moment, all disks and pads need replacing
The discs and pads are exactly the same on the 2.0 petrol as they are on the 2.2 HDi, as far as I understand it. If the discs and pads on Miss Pug are still legal, plenty of meat on 'em, swap them over with those on Pugster. This buys you some time.
Sonia406 wrote:handbrake is temperamental, sometimes it will hold, sometimes it needs adjusting and sometimes its seizing on even in motion.
Standard 406 fare, this one. The original design is a bit crap. You will probably find it needs a set of brake shoes, or that some kind of spring or tensioner inside the handbrake drum (inside the "bell" part of the rear discs) needs replaced. Possibly a handbrake cable. Any local independent garage should be able to fix this one up without it costing the earth.
Anyway, you'd never leave a 406 parked on a hill with only the handbrake keeping it in place; you'd leave it in gear and with the wheels pointing towards the kerb. That's just because the 406 handbrake design is crap. It's not so bad on the cars that only had rear drum brakes, like my old 1.8 saloon. The ones that have rear discs are the problem.
Sonia406 wrote:At the end of the day right, it's not as if I am saying I won't be doing the jobs - it just buys me some time to get it up there but by doing the brakes first, to ensure on the journey up there - I can stop.
We know you won't avoid getting it fixed properly. It's just that if something does go very horribly wrong between receiving your dodgy cerificate and the time at which you were planning on doing this, you wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on. I.E. if you needed to slam on the brakes, and either nothing happened at all, or the car took far too long to stop.
Sonia406 wrote:Many people are driving around illegal cars anyway, ones who have de-catted, and even those who have (like myself) removed the DPF.
Just because the canister is there, legally they both should have the filters in....
This is poor justification. I'd like to think no MOT person would certify a car if it wasn't safe to drive, but the idea that an MOT person might bend the air pollution or noise pollution rules a little isn't so bad. Unfortunately, with this thread, I realise that some MOT persons
would certify a car despite it being unsafe to drive. You've got brake trouble, not performance problems. Therefore the concern is safety, for you, your family, and for other road users.
The point is, we're not nagging you because we're goody-two-shoes people that never set a foot wrong. We're nagging you about it because you could get into a lot of trouble or have a very serious accident, and have no legal recourse and possibly even a lengthy hospital stay as a result.
I know you've got money issues, I sympethise, I really do - I'm not loaded either, and this is the worst time of year for parents' cashflow. But you can likely get away with using part-worn discs and pads that you already own, and don't need to cut this kind of corner. The financial ruin you might suffer if you get caught out makes this a really bad idea - it's not worth doing; please don't do it!
*** as an aside - if anyone on these forums are scrapping a 406 at the moment, you could see if the discs, pads, calipers, ABS sensors, etc. are all still available - that might help you out there?
EDIT: Floody is breaking a 110 HDi over on the For Sale / Wanted section. Not sure if the brake discs, pads, rear wheel hubs, etc. are still there and in usable condition? That's if the similar gear on Miss Pug is unsuitable, or you don't want to remove any stuff from Miss Pug.