exhaust question - not the usual one

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
no2lurch
3.0 24v
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:01 am
Location: Cannock, West Mids

exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by no2lurch »

on my 2.2 sri d9 it is only a matter of time before my back box gives up the ghost. now due to the silly price of a new one and the price of a stainless system, and my lack of funds with a baby on the way etc, would this work:

remove the back box and extend the remaining pipe back to exit where the standard pipe goes.

will it be silly loud?
will i loose/gain performance?
am i just being a wally?
Past car - D9 2.2 SRi estate, sleeper, family wagon & general hauler!
Current car - Ph3 1.8 306
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by mjb »

no2lurch wrote:remove the back box and extend the remaining pipe back to exit where the standard pipe goes.

will it be silly loud?
Yes.
will i loose/gain performance?
If anything you'll lose it
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by Welly »

That would sound horrible and the drop in back pressure is not good for a non-turbo car.
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by Doggy »

The back box fell off my 3.0 omega, leaving just a cat in each down pipe. Granted I only drove it a mile or so to get sorted but it was LOUD. Popped & banged on the overun too. 8)

Only the mental image of the remaining stub ending next to the fuel tank forestalled further 'research'. :twisted:
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
User avatar
HimBigChief
3.0 24v
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: Rural Northumberland
Contact:

Re: exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by HimBigChief »

I ran my 2.1TD without a backbox for about a month while I got round to fitting the stainless. Wasn't offensively loud, but was obvious that the backbox was missing. It will no doubt be much worse on a petrol too.
Image Image
'98 2.1TD Executive Daily Drive........................................'94 309 Goodwood Project Car
FarmerPug
2.0 HDI 110
Posts: 9656
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:42 pm
Location: The Countryside, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: exhaust question - not the usual one

Post by FarmerPug »

when my whole exhaust was off it wasnt silly loud it was offensivley loud, pretty girls would look at the car in disgust, and bora drivers looked bewildered that a non bora could make such a terrible sound, but the performance was unaffected all i noticed was that i drove much more economically/gently just so it didnt make the noise. But thats just on a oil burner some petrols sound good without a backbox the saxo is not one of them, the alfa v6, and jeep cherokee being some that do sound good.
Post Reply