Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Post by Welly »

Ever wondered why it's so hard to get near the quoted MPG for your car?

This univeral test might help to explain why......

FUEL CONSUMPTION TEST (Directive 80/1268/EEC as amended by 2004/3/EC)

The new test has been agreed internationally and provides results that are more representative of actual average on-road fuel consumption than previous tests. There are two parts: an urban and an extra-urban cycle. The test cycle is the same as that used to determine the official exhaust emission classification for the model of vehicle in question.

The cars tested have to be run-in and must have been driven for at least 1,800 miles (3,000 kilometres) before testing.

Urban cycle
The urban test cycle is carried out in a laboratory at an ambient temperature of 20°C to 30°C on a rolling road from a cold start, i.e. the engine has not run for several hours. The cycle consists of a series of accelerations, steady speeds, decelerations and idling. Maximum speed is 31 mph (50 km/h), average speed 12 mph (19 km/h) and the distance covered is 2.5 miles (4 km).

Extra-urban cycle
This cycle is conducted immediately following the urban cycle and consists of roughly half steady-speed driving and the remainder accelerations, decelerations, and some idling. Maximum speed is 75 mph (120 km/h), average speed is 39 mph (63 km/h) and the distance covered is 4.3 miles (7 km).

Combined Fuel Consumption Figure
The combined figure presented is for the urban and the extra-urban cycle together. It is therefore an average of the two parts of the test, weighted by the distances covered in each part.
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Post by Doggy »

I'm trying to decide whether that's a level virtual playing field, or a virtually level playing field :?

Either way, at least it's the same every time. What relation it bears to reality though, I'm not sure.........
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Post by Welly »

dogslife wrote: What relation it bears to reality though, I'm not sure.........
Well if it is carried out in a nice cosy Laboratory then where's all the wind resistance we get out on the roads? (unless they actually blow air at the car?) :roll:

You can see the idea though I suppose, comparing like for like, like :|
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Post by mjb »

I just wonder how they get around the fact that they're accelerating on a rolling road, where the vehicle's weight has no effect on the effort required to accelerate (hint, you can accelerate from 0-150mph in about a second and use virtually no fuel to do it if you're on axle stands...), unless the rolling road is setup to increase+decrease resistance to mimic it...

Still, I find I can greatly exceed the manufacturer's quoted economy figures if I want to ;)
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
nutski
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:43 am
Location: Norwich

Re: Why we never seem to match manufacturers quoted MPG

Post by nutski »

I get told by my other half its because i have a heavy right foot.... :?
1997 2.1 TD Exec (Sold)
1997 3.0 V6 Coupe S (Sold)
2001 406 HDi 110 GTX (Sold)
2002 406 Coupe HDi SE (RIP)
2003 406 Estate HDi 2.2 SE (Sold)
2003 406 Coupe HDi SE (To be sold)
2001 406 Coupe 3.0 V6 SE
2003 406 2.2 HDi SE
Post Reply