FarmerPug wrote:why is there a belt used to drive the cams, wouldnt some mechanical system like cogs or the thing old locomotives used for turning the wheel be better.
surely a load of cogs would have more resistance, sapping power from the engine. chains still stretch and need to be changed, just less often.
Past car - D9 2.2 SRi estate, sleeper, family wagon & general hauler!
Current car - Ph3 1.8 306
Ford's Essex had a gear to drive the camshaft (made out of plastic ) Aircooled VWs too, there's probably quite a few. It's not so easy with overhead cams though... (Mad Italians notwithstanding)
There seems to be a trend of a return to cam chains recently - I've heard of a fair few on modern engines (I think the Honda CCTTDCDDCCTi has a chain?) I suppose they've developed lighter, stronger, quieter chains of late. Also isn't a cam chain kinda 'in' the engine so benefits from all the oiling it wants?
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
Honda?!! They've always been well known in the biking community for licorice cam chains that eat through crankcases Hopefully they've improved them, cam chains in general used to need changing about as often as a belt (or they'd get as noisy as hell, eat through casings and eventually break, with predictable consequences). At least a belt is easier to get to...
On the topic of the honda icdti, where did they get that from, for all its life honda has made petrols, did they just single handedly make a brand new diesel engine all on their own? And them accords are meant to consume quite a bit of oil, but unfortunatley i have to say it seems like quite a decent engine and them accords are quite a nice solid car.
lozz that merc is one from the time when they were knowm for the faults, nice car but probably more unreliable than a peugeot, the c class before it got away ok just with rust issues.
steve_earwig wrote:Honda?!! They've always been well known in the biking community for licorice cam chains that eat through crankcases
Say it isn't so! I've done 74K on my CB and it's still going strong! (Touch wood)
1996 406 1.8LX Got a bad case of hydro lock!
1996 406 Executive 2.0 Turbo XU10J2TE No longer hangin' on in there
1997 Honda CB500V
2003 Volvo V40 1.8 GDi SE killed by a nutter in a beemer 5 series
2008 Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X
"Always look on the bright side of life, dedo, dedo dedodedo"
Welly wrote:.........still don't park it near anyone though
Waste of time, welly. They'll all know who's it is by now.
Have a good weekend!
He heeeeeee
FarmerPug - Honda did indeed make the icdtiddccddtti all on there own and my only remotely interesting fact I know about the thing is that it doesn't have a separate Head as such i.e. the engine is a sump then the block+'head' are one piece and inseparable, kinda.......I think it was a way of reliably holding high compression and boost without the 'weak spot' of a head gasket.
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
whats wrong with them i was in an accord ctidtdidi and it was a nice and smooth engine, a bit less powerful than what i would have expected from a 2.2 but not a bad car.
so there is no seperate head? is this some sort of long bolt engine trying to be the diesel equivilant of the k series?