Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Bailes1992
Moderator
Posts: 4292
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Bridgend, South Wales

Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by Bailes1992 »

As I'm now on company insurance I'm insured to drive my old Mans T5.
Bare in mind it's a FWD Volvo estate with 230bhp. 0-60 in 6.7s and 150mph.
Now I had to drop my Dad off and pick him up from Cardiff. Once I put my foot down and found it pointless.
It's too fast, you put for foot down for a few seconds and before you know it your in ban territory.

Now my HDi90 I can hammer, drive as hard as I like and never really break the speed limit. And it still does 47mpg :roll:

Anyone else feel this way?
2020 BMW 520d MSport Touring My Daily
2017 Dacia Logan MCV 1.5DCi Laureate Wifes
1996 Land Rover Defender 90 County SW 300TDi My Toy
2003 Ford Mondeo ST220 3.0 V6 My Other Toy
User avatar
Gary406
The moderator with a 1.9TD!
Posts: 5315
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:56 pm
Location: Wigan, Lancashire

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by Gary406 »

dont get caught and you can have as much fun as you like :mrgreen:
i would sooner have 2 much power than 2 less ...
2004 (04) Volkswagen Bora 1.9 TDi (100)
User avatar
highlander
PowerFlow Shill
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by highlander »

Gary406 wrote:i would sooner have 2 much power than 2 less ...
Having owned a 1149cc Renault Clio (57 HP), and having driven a 6192cc Lamborghini Murcielago (572 HP), I can honestly say that I would agree with Gary 8)

It's not just about 0-60 times, it's not just about your top speed - a fun car is fun due to a combination of the power-to-weight ratio, the steering/suspension setup, the weight distribution, and (most importantly) how it makes you feel. You should never feel that you're fighting a car to get performance out of it, but similarly, you should never feel that the car is going to kill you - it's about striking the balance.

I love the way my Coupe drives; sure it's only 160 HP, and maybe she could do with another 50 - 100 HP so that the performance can match the looks, but she can still move pretty damn sharpish, and make a great noise when she does. Such an improvement over the old 1.8 saloon in absolutely every respect.
2002 (D9) Peugeot 406 Coupe SE, 2.2 litre Petrol. Scarlet Red/Rouge Ecarlate/Rosso Scarlatto. Black Leather interior. SOLD :(
2008 (E60 LCI) BMW 525i M-Sport, 3.0 litre Petrol. Carbonschwarz Metallic. Black Dakota Leather and Myrtlewood interior.
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by Doggy »

....or get a fast HDi. :twisted:
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by Welly »

I think it's good to have a big shove of power for overtaking.

I enjoy the feel of a powerful car, you don't have to rag the nuts off it all the time but you can give it a 'squirt' when you want and enjoy the acceleration.

I do get what you mean though bailes, we should all drive steadily and economically and all at the same pace. I suppose the ideal set up would be to have an economical 1.6HDi for normal use and then a good track car for weekend events :|
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by gumby6371 »

I can sit on the fence on this one, it is really nice to know that you have enough power to overtake if you want/need to but you do need to be very concious of what you're doing at all times.
I was taking my kids back to there mom's on sunday afternoon, joined a dual carriageway behind a Berlingo who then sat there at 55. I decided to overtake, foot down but nowhere near floored it, pulled out, next thing my eldest said to me 'are you allowed to do 95 dad?'
I can honestly say I had no idea I was going that fast and that was in a 1996 1.9td.
My first thought was how pleased I was with my new car, second thought was that's an instant ban if I get caught and I need my car!!!!
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
User avatar
OdinEidolon
3.0 24v
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:24 pm
Location: Belluno, Italy

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by OdinEidolon »

I can say that the most fun car I've ever driven is my beloved and now scrapped Peugeot 106. Tremendous fun, perfect handling. And... 1.5 litre diesel non-turbo, 56hp, 80 mpg. EIGHTY!
It's sad knowing I'll never own a car that good anymore... they don't make them like that anymore.
2001 2.2HDi saloon Executive (not the English exec, worse!) in Obsidian Black. Semi-Mux D9, build code 8761
Image
Image
Want a remap? Contact us, learn to do it yourself on ecuedit.com or let the professionals of editecu.com do it for you!

ecuedit.com | carecus.com | editecu.com | boschecus.com | carsrubber.com | egrswitch.com | car-specification.com
User avatar
Doggy
Mod with a 2.2 HDi, De-Fapped!
Posts: 10710
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Northants

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by Doggy »

Welly wrote:I think it's good to have a big shove of power for overtaking.

I enjoy the feel of a powerful car, you don't have to rag the nuts off it all the time but you can give it a 'squirt' when you want and enjoy the acceleration.

I do get what you mean though bailes, we should all drive steadily and economically and all at the same pace. I suppose the ideal set up would be to have an economical 1.6HDi for normal use and then a good track car for weekend events :|
I can relate to that, but suspect the 1.6HDi owner will either spend the weekends fixing it or flogging the track car to pay someone else to.
2002 HDi 2.2 Exec Estate, (2008-12) (wonderful)
2003 HDi 2.2 6-speed Exec Estate (2012-19) (also a gem)
2009 Citroen C5 2.0 HDi VTR+ Estate (godawful heap)
2008 BMW E91 330i touring (great fun - murdered by a reversing SUV)
2007 BMW E91 325i touring (slower smoother quieter)
User avatar
waue1978
HDi don't believe it!
Posts: 2341
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Andover, Hampshire

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by waue1978 »

Bailes1992 wrote:As I'm now on company insurance I'm insured to drive my old Mans T5.
Bare in mind it's a FWD Volvo estate with 230bhp. 0-60 in 6.7s and 150mph.
Now I had to drop my Dad off and pick him up from Cardiff. Once I put my foot down and found it pointless.
It's too fast, you put for foot down for a few seconds and before you know it your in ban territory.

Now my HDi90 I can hammer, drive as hard as I like and never really break the speed limit. And it still does 47mpg :roll:

Anyone else feel this way?
I honestly would have thought that living in the valleys, you wouldn't need to ask such a question. One Sunday, take the 406 out along the single carriageway roads nearby. When you come across the inevitable doddery old bu**er doing 30mph in the 60 limit, overtake at the first available opportunity - preferably with a nice gap in the traffic.

The following weekend do the same test in your Dad's T5 & see how much earlier you get past...

Been a long time since I had a car quick enough to overtake on single carriageways without needing plenty of space. Think the Cav GSi was probably the best one for that, but that said, the 325tds had enough to overtake without too much drama whilst still capable of 40mpg+.
2000/X Peugeot 406 110 HDi LX Family 93k to 2000/W BMW 530D SE Auto 84k to 2003/03 Peugeot Partner Hdi Escapade 98k to 2003/53 Vauxhall Zafira DTi Elegance 74k

Image
User avatar
OdinEidolon
3.0 24v
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:24 pm
Location: Belluno, Italy

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by OdinEidolon »

waue1978 wrote:
Bailes1992 wrote:As I'm now on company insurance I'm insured to drive my old Mans T5.
Bare in mind it's a FWD Volvo estate with 230bhp. 0-60 in 6.7s and 150mph.
Now I had to drop my Dad off and pick him up from Cardiff. Once I put my foot down and found it pointless.
It's too fast, you put for foot down for a few seconds and before you know it your in ban territory.

Now my HDi90 I can hammer, drive as hard as I like and never really break the speed limit. And it still does 47mpg :roll:

Anyone else feel this way?
I honestly would have thought that living in the valleys, you wouldn't need to ask such a question. One Sunday, take the 406 out along the single carriageway roads nearby. When you come across the inevitable doddery old bu**er doing 30mph in the 60 limit, overtake at the first available opportunity - preferably with a nice gap in the traffic.

The following weekend do the same test in your Dad's T5 & see how much earlier you get past...

Been a long time since I had a car quick enough to overtake on single carriageways without needing plenty of space. Think the Cav GSi was probably the best one for that, but that said, the 325tds had enough to overtake without too much drama whilst still capable of 40mpg+.
With good timing both the 110 and the 2.2 have enough grunt to overtake whatever you want... you just need to take consideration of the turbo lag.
2001 2.2HDi saloon Executive (not the English exec, worse!) in Obsidian Black. Semi-Mux D9, build code 8761
Image
Image
Want a remap? Contact us, learn to do it yourself on ecuedit.com or let the professionals of editecu.com do it for you!

ecuedit.com | carecus.com | editecu.com | boschecus.com | carsrubber.com | egrswitch.com | car-specification.com
User avatar
waue1978
HDi don't believe it!
Posts: 2341
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Andover, Hampshire

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by waue1978 »

OdinEidolon wrote: With good timing both the 110 and the 2.2 have enough grunt to overtake whatever you want... you just need to take consideration of the turbo lag.
This is true, but the point I am making is that with a faster car you don't need to rely on the good timing as much. A remapped 2.2 would do the job, but the 110 is not "a fast car" - merely adequate.

There used to be a (short lived) TV series that was either on Channel 4 or 5 that used to do a test where they would follow a truck doing a set speed, then pull out to overtake & try to fully pass before they reached the end of their coned off overtaking gap. Think it was called Driven, but it had Jason Plato & Penny Mallory in it before they respectively went to 5th Gear & the also short lived Used Car Road Show (with Jason Dawe - the fat bloke that managed 1 or 2 episodes of Top Gear then took his umm-ah act to ITV).

The program was sh*te, but that was the best test I'd seen for proper power testing. A top of the range special edition Evo may put in a good time round the Top Gear test track, but it would have still been waiting for the turbo to spool up to pass that truck.
2000/X Peugeot 406 110 HDi LX Family 93k to 2000/W BMW 530D SE Auto 84k to 2003/03 Peugeot Partner Hdi Escapade 98k to 2003/53 Vauxhall Zafira DTi Elegance 74k

Image
nutski
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:43 am
Location: Norwich

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by nutski »

waue1978 wrote: This is true, but the point I am making is that with a faster car you don't need to rely on the good timing as much. A remapped 2.2 would do the job, but the 110 is not "a fast car" - merely adequate.
Don't discount a remapped 110, mine was very quick as my dad reminded me last week when overtook me coming off a slip road and my 2.2 HDi is not slow :)
waue1978 wrote: There used to be a (short lived) TV series that was either on Channel 4 or 5 that used to do a test where they would follow a truck doing a set speed, then pull out to overtake & try to fully pass before they reached the end of their coned off overtaking gap. Think it was called Driven, but it had Jason Plato & Penny Mallory in it before they respectively went to 5th Gear & the also short lived Used Car Road Show (with Jason Dawe - the fat bloke that managed 1 or 2 episodes of Top Gear then took his umm-ah act to ITV).
A mate at work gave me a link to a video about that a few weeks ago, they were showing a Polo overtaking the truck with the cones, then did it again in the same car with NOS..... :shock:
1997 2.1 TD Exec (Sold)
1997 3.0 V6 Coupe S (Sold)
2001 406 HDi 110 GTX (Sold)
2002 406 Coupe HDi SE (RIP)
2003 406 Estate HDi 2.2 SE (Sold)
2003 406 Coupe HDi SE (To be sold)
2001 406 Coupe 3.0 V6 SE
2003 406 2.2 HDi SE
User avatar
OdinEidolon
3.0 24v
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:24 pm
Location: Belluno, Italy

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by OdinEidolon »

waue1978 wrote:
OdinEidolon wrote: With good timing both the 110 and the 2.2 have enough grunt to overtake whatever you want... you just need to take consideration of the turbo lag.
This is true, but the point I am making is that with a faster car you don't need to rely on the good timing as much. A remapped 2.2 would do the job, but the 110 is not "a fast car" - merely adequate.
Of course, however many will agree that the expense of having a very powerful car is not worth the smile it can put on your face when overtaking. Still, when a certain horsepower limit is passed I guess it's more a matter of look mine's bigger than yours... ahem passion.
2001 2.2HDi saloon Executive (not the English exec, worse!) in Obsidian Black. Semi-Mux D9, build code 8761
Image
Image
Want a remap? Contact us, learn to do it yourself on ecuedit.com or let the professionals of editecu.com do it for you!

ecuedit.com | carecus.com | editecu.com | boschecus.com | carsrubber.com | egrswitch.com | car-specification.com
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by sirwiggum »

I had an Alfa GTV 2.0 TS, was only 150bhp but was quite light and quick. There was nowhere really to rag it properly, did get a couple of good drives out of it, but most of the time you're stuck in traffic and no real overtaking opportunities.

The HDi 90, I didn't notice going from 150 to 90 bhp that much day to day. OK on the motorway it took a bit longer to get up to speed, but stuck in traffic or following someone at 60mph, you can be in a Ferrari and you're going to get the same journey out of a £500 diesel car.

Current car is also 150bhp, more of a cruiser but has a good kickdown for power if needed.
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
omega
3.0 24v
Posts: 1745
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:25 am
Location: nottingham

Re: Is having a fast car all it's cracked out to be?

Post by omega »

you cant beat a fast car but what is a fast car?
100,150,200,300,400+ bhp?
ferrari,scooby,etc

to me its not bhp or the name on the bonnet its the feel
a fast car should be a extension of you
its putting the car into the bend faster than you would your 406,its feeling the tyres bite knowing how far you can push before it gets messey,its knowing the car and its takeing the long way home,or getting up early just to take the car out.and when your at home you look outside and have a little smile everytime you see it.
Post Reply