Map sensor can be ermmm modified to allow extra pressure


Moderator: Moderators
i bought it for my old diesel which died, and never botherd to do anything with it, basically coz i cant be arsedniz406 wrote:Your right on the Oxygen sensor but this is where the FSE PBV comes in, as long as you buy one with the guage you can change the pressure to your own needs...
Map sensor can be ermmm modified to allow extra pressureand the inlet manifold can be swapped out you can get another from a scrappers !
Its very doable ! not sure why you've not used your T2 ???
FAQ - 406 D8 petrol (excl. V6) running and starting problemsPeugeot wrote:what are you worried about? we made car that lasted 10 years"..."Zat is very goode non?
FAQ - 406 D8 petrol (excl. V6) running and starting problemsPeugeot wrote:what are you worried about? we made car that lasted 10 years"..."Zat is very goode non?
it runs like a bag of shite anywayniz406 wrote:TBH if you dont do it properly it will probably return faults or will cause your car to run like a bag of shite ! lol
FAQ - 406 D8 petrol (excl. V6) running and starting problemsPeugeot wrote:what are you worried about? we made car that lasted 10 years"..."Zat is very goode non?
correct most of the bosch n/a map sensors only read upto 105kpa( a little over atmospheric pressure (100kpa or 1bar whatever ya like), you cant just swap around map sensors as they have varying values at varying voltage outputs you might get lucky and find a map sensor that is plug and play but i very much doubt it this would mean a new map sensor + remap to just get things running safe :p not quite so plug and playjameslxdt wrote:the stock engine management is crap and would never work with it, the ignition timing and injector duration will be all wrong, it will log a map sensor fault and most likely an oxygen sensor fault the first time you hit boost
correct yep but the map sensor is also calibrated to send back a vary voltage 0-5v whatever values it is set to, for exampleniz406 wrote:Your MAP sensor calculates internally and sends the required signal to the ECM, the signal is based on voltage strength.. so a variable resisitor inline with this could adjust the signal and stop any errors
Reference Voltage
- Pin 1 MAP - 12 ECM
Sensor Return
- Pin 2 MAP - 26 ECM
Signal Voltage
- Pin 3 MAP - 7 ECM
TBH if you dont do it properly it will probably return faults or will cause your car to run like a bag of shite ! lol
you do know how much timing you have to pull as soon as you go into any sort of posative pressure?niz406 wrote: As I've said before Knock detection will not be a problem providing you have your thermo-dynamics implemented properly.. i.e. decent intercooler and you keep it low boost, the boost level is key, you will have a minimal impact on the overal heat / load placed on the engine!
Dude I did say and I quote:Malachy wrote:Wideband again is not plug and play the replacement sensor that dp engineering offer is suited to a wideband controller, you cant just wire it into any ecu. you get sensor>controller>ecu you then program the controller to suit the ecu or vice versa.
By stock unit I was refering to standard OS:Niz406 wrote:well and then the addition of remap / piggy back if you don't want to try it on the stock unit
i havent seen any controllers able to replicate what your wanting there, although to be fair i havent looked wideband can replicate a nb signal but that still does not give you afr problem you will have, and i still think a raising rate fuel reg is in all honesty a bit of a cowboy way of dealing with things, it still needs setting up correctly on a rr monitering afr etc.niz406 wrote:Dude I did say and I quote:Malachy wrote:Wideband again is not plug and play the replacement sensor that dp engineering offer is suited to a wideband controller, you cant just wire it into any ecu. you get sensor>controller>ecu you then program the controller to suit the ecu or vice versa.
By stock unit I was refering to standard OS:Niz406 wrote:well and then the addition of remap / piggy back if you don't want to try it on the stock unit
- 0v - 1v
- 1.0volt - constant WOT
- 0v - Fuel cut-off
- 0.4v to 0.5v - Ignition On
- 200mv to 1000mv - Engine running
- 1 Second Switching Frequency
ok must be impossible to pull ignition on non dizzy engines, ...................................... and yep about 5 degress less at 130kpa than the equivilent load/rpm site at 100kpa is about right for that boost aplication got fk all to do with mfi engines dont know what clap trap your going on about there.Niz406 wrote: Well its actually going to be about 5 p.s.i / 33.5kpa but 5 degrees, w0w I wish it was as easy as a turn of the distributor, oh well not that would be easier, much easier on old MFi engines !![]()
thats nice however peak torque usually does not occur just before knock.Niz406 wrote: However, For a given high compression engine at engine speeds greater than idle optimal ignition timing is quite close to the point of onset of knock. Running so close to this point means that knock will inevitably happen on one or more cylinders at certain times during engine cycles. The MP5.2 ECM has a knock control unit internally, and a knock sensor( KS ) on the block to help prevent knock.
Initially, timing will occur at its optimal ignition point, once knock is identified the knock control microprocessor retards the ignition timing. When knock ceases the timing is advanced until the reference timing value is achieved or knock occurs once more when timing is again retarded. This procedure continually occurs so that the engine will run at the optimum timing. If a fault exists in the knock control processor an appropriate DTC will be logged in the self diagnostic unit, and the ignition timing retarded by the LOS Program. Which is obviously not a good thing.
nope there should not be but this has still not been resolvedNiz406 wrote: But if temps are kept down and mixture is optimal and the MAP sensor addressed then there shouldn't be any major differences in knock, should there?
yeah its a pain but i havent got a spare £5k+ for DAMOS or similarNiz406 wrote: Winols.... yeah good luck with that one, not the easiest of applications, deffo expert user software.... lol
nah not at all never mentioned any discounts at my unit? well nah as i have said i dont have a 'unit' however i do have access and use of a dynomite rolling road for now and will be working on premisis for later next year.Niz406 wrote: Ahhh so soon you will be supplying us all with solutions and bolt on packages and upgrades? With great discounts....lol Hows about a free set up for my motor for shows and demo's and open days at your unit? lol
Dude, I just want it to work and be as cheap as possible, it will run and it will work! I never said I was a formula 1 technician, just an enthusiast... I can see I'm going to have to buy a 406 2.0 16v and install a blower just to prove I'm right !Malachy wrote:i still think a raising rate fuel reg is in all honesty a bit of a cowboy way of dealing with things
On the Ford turanus V6 block its MFi no electronics stopping you from bolting on a tub and having some fun, in fact the first TT kit kit for it givves you an output of guess what 220hp almost a 50% increase on stock internals, all you have to do on that is advance the ignition a couple of degrees.Malachy wrote: ok must be impossible to pull ignition on non dizzy engines, ...................................... and yep about 5 degress less at 130kpa than the equivilent load/rpm site at 100kpa is about right for that boost aplication got fk all to do with mfi engines dont know what clap trap your going on about there.