Pointless Vehicles

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Pointless Vehicles

Post by gumby6371 »

I know the whole chelsea tractor thing has been done to death but....
Followed a Range Rover sport on my way home last night and I couldn't believe how little ground clearance it had, maybe an inch or 2 more than my 406. Why would you buy an expensive 4*4 that's little more than a reasonably quick MPV?

The same with the new mini, great for tight spaces on the supermarket car park, can't actually fit any shopping in it tho!!

A woman at work wanted to take a hoover back to the shop but had to wait for her husband to get home as it wouldn't fit in her 1 series BMW.

The list goes on.....
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
User avatar
lozz
3.0 24v
Posts: 11908
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: where-ever

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by lozz »

gumby6371 wrote:I know the whole chelsea tractor thing has been done to death but....
Followed a Range Rover sport on my way home last night and I couldn't believe how little ground clearance it had, maybe an inch or 2 more than my 406. Why would you buy an expensive 4*4 that's little more than a reasonably quick MPV?

The same with the new mini, great for tight spaces on the supermarket car park, can't actually fit any shopping in it tho!!

A woman at work wanted to take a hoover back to the shop but had to wait for her husband to get home as it wouldn't fit in her 1 series BMW.

The list goes on.....
Iwas afan of rangerovers a few years ago,
it lasted about 6mths, Novelty wore off.. price of tyres and fuel left me skint so igot rid.
iwouidnt buy anything else like that again,

the ones you see lowerd are normaly owned by Drug dealers for that oh look at Me im a Gangsta look,
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by Welly »

This is funny as I was thinking the exact same thing this morning :o

I cannot believe the huge range of Cars that BMW and Audi have for example :shock: an X1, X3?, X5 then a Q1? Q3, Q5, Q7 all in the fashionable Sport/Utility/Softroader style and all slightly different in shape and size but they're everywhere it seems.



The Mini Countryman I cannot understand - a Mahoosive Mini? why? :?

The Evoque is purely for showing off and is probably crap at everything but showing off :roll:
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
leestudd30
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:43 am
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by leestudd30 »

The new Mini's are a joke, just how many different body styles do they need?
1997 2 litre GLX 4dr now dead!
2005 Citroen Xsara Picasso Desire HDi
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by Welly »

leestudd30 wrote:The new Mini's are a joke, just how many different body styles do they need?
One for each 'type' of show off I suppose :roll:

There's always the 'tragic show off' - those that buy a 2003 Mini to be 'in the gang' but can't really afford to be :|

I saw a 7-year old Mini Crapper S for sale in my local rag for £6,000.00 recently :shock: now THAT'S a joke.
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
Posts: 19813
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by steve_earwig »

Them BMW Mini things are like all these Hollywood remakes, trying to capitalise on the success of an original rather than come up with any original ideas of your own :evil: Fire every single last one of the buggers off that nutter's trebuchet and, when they're in a massive big heap, put a match to it. I'd pay big money to watch that :twisted:
Unskilled meddling sin©e 2007

The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.
grasmere59
3.0 24v
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:23 pm

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by grasmere59 »

Iwas afan of rangerovers a few years ago,
it lasted about 6mths, Novelty wore off.. price of tyres and fuel left me skint so igot rid.
iwouidnt buy anything else like that again,
[/quote]

A mate of mine repairs 4x4's for a living mostly landrovers etc and he had a Range Rover sport in the other day for a handbrake cable,it was £450 plus fitting!!!! aparently as it's electric you have to buy the cables and module as one unit,bargain :D
2011 "11" Mondeo TXS est 200ps in Grey
2003 "53" 110 hdi Executive Estate in Diablo Red
2001 "51" BMW 530i sport in Black
2012 "62" Yamaha XT1200
1974 "M" Honda CB500/4
1994 "M" Kawasaki Zephyr 1100
1998 "S" Honda XRV 750
User avatar
Captain Jack
3.0 24v
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Langford, Somerset

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by Captain Jack »

Yes, I think that every day. I live in a relatively "posh" estate and it's all 11 and 12 reg X1's, X3's etc... Most of the are pointless and people have them because they can either afford them or have them as company cars (or leased).

I think my car is the oldest one in a half mile radius.... My girlfriend drives a Suzuki Swift 1.5L. Nice little car, perfect for city driving - what more could you want?
2003 - 2008: 1998 Peugeot 406 2.1 TD 110bhp LX Saloon
2008 - 2009: 2004 Honda Accord 2.2 CDTI 136bhp Executive Saloon
2009 - 2013: 2002 Peugeot 406 2.0 HDI 110bhp Executive Saloon
2013 - 2021: 2007 Peugeot 407 2.2 HDI 170bhp Executive Saloon (mapped to 213bhp :twisted:)
2021 - ????: 2016 Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi 180bhp Titanium
KozmoNaut
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Pointless Vehicles

Post by KozmoNaut »

Captain Jack wrote:My girlfriend drives a Suzuki Swift 1.5L. Nice little car, perfect for city driving - what more could you want?
But it's rubbish if you need your car to reinforce your sorely lacking masculinity. As if driving a "big bad" minivan on stilts would be any different, but apparently people are suckered by the adverts.

Actually, I know one particular reason why softroaders and other tall-ish vehicles are popular. They allow you to look over most other cars on the road. I've driven my dad's Boxer van a bunch and it's actually quite nice being able to see farther ahead.

The higher body and ground clearance allows for longer suspension travel and the added weight smooths out bumps in the road. But that's just because car designers are lazy. Big Peugeots and hydropneumatic Citroëns prove that you can be sleek and comfortable at the same time if you put some effort into it.

Another factor is that by being higher up than those around you, you instinctively feel safer. So really, the people who buy these cars are insecure and ruled by their primitive lizard brains.

The real problem comes when everyone is driving a minivan on stilts and you lose the height advantage. What then?
2000 406 TS4 2.2 saloon
Post Reply