New variation on the old turbo woes...

Discuss, ask, or get help with engine and mechanical queries in here.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
supafrisk
Horse Whipper
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:22 am

New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by supafrisk »

Most of you will know I have had the same problems with my 406 as Landymad, ie intermittent power, for well over a year now.
I've replaced pipes, MAFs, solenoids, even the turbo :shock:
And still we have "good days" and "bad days" :evil:
Even the main stealers have found it baffling.
So yesterday it was running particularly poorly whilst out on a run to the point where it was an embarrassment to drive it, a mik float actually had more power :oops:
So I knocked the engine off at a set of lights and restarted it, which usually clears it for a bit. Firstly I noticed for the first time an odd whistle.
When I say odd I don't mean the familiar turbo whistle, I'd never heard whatever this is.
I was baffled and put it down the the window being open.
However, I got home and as the car had run pathetically I popped the bonnet a couple of minutes after switching off, mainly to see how much of a pig it was going to be to get the EGR off.
Whilst I was stood there there was what I can only describe as a funny noise like an old kettle whistling for about 5 seconds which tailed off.
The funny thing is, the car is now flying. And when I say flying, I mean keeping up with a Celica last night :shock:

Did I broked it or is there a more suitable explanation for it? :shock:
jasper5
3.0 24v
Posts: 3689
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:30 pm

Re: New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by jasper5 »

I may have mentioned this before, but I've heard of the intercooler side splitting under pressure, this makes a strange noise when it happens.

The front bumper has to come off check it.
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by mjb »

supafrisk wrote:I popped the bonnet a couple of minutes after switching off...a funny noise like an old kettle whistling for about 5 seconds which tailed off.
So the whistling was there for a couple of minutes after stopping the engine? :shock:

Surely the charged area wouldn't be pressurised with the engine off and if it were, would discharge a lot quicker than that by blowing the turbo backwards?

I don't know diesels, but the only things that I think could whistle without the engine are the fuel tank pressure equaliser valve thing, the charged air section and air trapped in the cooling system. What if it's the first? Usually the pressure valve thing for the fuel tank (lives next to the ECU box on the V6) goes "bzzzt-tschhhh" every so often and then about a minute after stopping the car, but if it weren't working then as fuel got pumped out, there'd be a hefty vacuum building up which would reduce throughput on the fuel pump and seriously kill power?
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
User avatar
supafrisk
Horse Whipper
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:22 am

Re: New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by supafrisk »

mjb wrote:
supafrisk wrote:I popped the bonnet a couple of minutes after switching off...a funny noise like an old kettle whistling for about 5 seconds which tailed off.
So the whistling was there for a couple of minutes after stopping the engine? :shock:

Surely the charged area wouldn't be pressurised with the engine off and if it were, would discharge a lot quicker than that by blowing the turbo backwards?

I don't know diesels, but the only things that I think could whistle without the engine are the fuel tank pressure equaliser valve thing, the charged air section and air trapped in the cooling system. What if it's the first? Usually the pressure valve thing for the fuel tank (lives next to the ECU box on the V6) goes "bzzzt-tschhhh" every so often and then about a minute after stopping the car, but if it weren't working then as fuel got pumped out, there'd be a hefty vacuum building up which would reduce throughput on the fuel pump and seriously kill power?
Too technical for a bird like me :shock:
User avatar
supafrisk
Horse Whipper
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:22 am

Re: New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by supafrisk »

jasper5 wrote:I may have mentioned this before, but I've heard of the intercooler side splitting under pressure, this makes a strange noise when it happens.

The front bumper has to come off check it.
That's a Chris 'n' Dave job, I think :supafrisk:
User avatar
mjb
Site Admin
Posts: 7983
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Stoke

Re: New variation on the old turbo woes...

Post by mjb »

supafrisk wrote:Too technical for a bird like me :shock:
Ok you've surely noticed about a minute after killing the engine, something under the bonnet normally goes "bzzzt-tschhhh" on 406s?

Well that's a valve opening that lets air into the top of the fuel tank. Why?

Imagine a 500ml bottle of coke is your fuel tank. Put your gob over its top forming a seal and you're the fuel pump. You can drink some out, but then a vacuum forms and you have to let go and break the seal so air can get in so you can get more coke out. That's why you drink from a bottle with only your bottom lip forming a seal - you need air to get in else nothing can come out. Same with the fuel tank. If no air gets in, then the pump can't pull fuel out

That's my theory for the power loss and hissing
<steve_earwig> I think this forum is more about keeping our cars going with minimal outlay than giving our cars more reason to go bang
Post Reply