And I think due to the sheer amount of Mondeos on the road compared to 407's means the problem stories are more common.
I do fancy a 407 coupe though

Moderator: Moderators
Pleeeeease, some punctuation! I really cannot extrapolate anything from that messagemidsdaz wrote:The mondeos are not what try used to be my uncles got a standerd diesel one and it sounds like a bag of sh*t the crank pulley got some fund design and makes some right bad noise and to sort it ur
Looking at 300 just for the kit althought they don't need it if u can put up with the noise apart from that his never really had a problem with it apart from his
Dodgy mehcanic who fitted a new engine and the turbo doesn't work the works garage owner has one and he swears by it reckons its a top motor it's aldepends on what ur prefer
You know what?trem1 wrote:Sam.........which one would you feel proudest standing next to saying " yes this IS mine actually" THATS the one for you
Mondeo also remaps to 185bhp thoughFarmerPug wrote:The slow 0-60 time would be offset if it was remapped to 185bhp.
Agreed. If you buy a 407 you can just get PP2000 on it before buying and thus you can check it's functionality, leaks, injectors state, past repairs etc.FarmerPug wrote:The price for injectors or DMF for the mondeo look offputitng.
also its a mondeo, the 407 is a big comfy GT coupe, it doesnt need to go fast while your crusing down the riviera if you were going fast how could onlookers apperciate the stunning looks of your car.![]()
The extra 200kg of the 407 gives it a 5 star euro ncap rating the mondeo has 4 stars.
Another plus for the peugeot is that its easy to get a pp2000 off ebay for a fairly low price which can keep the dealer away, im sure ford has something similar but the pp2000 works great
Don't put too much weight in the 0-60 time. It can be adversely affected by the gearing. You really need to drive both to get an accurate guage of which one feels quick & also be aware of what type of use it will get to judge if it has the performance where it counts. The old london taxis are quicker to 30mph than a McLaren F1 was, but on the motorway we all know which would be better.FarmerPug wrote:The slow 0-60 time would be offset if it was remapped to 185bhp.
+1waue1978 wrote:Don't put too much weight in the 0-60 time. It can be adversely affected by the gearing. You really need to drive both to get an accurate guage of which one feels quick & also be aware of what type of use it will get to judge if it has the performance where it counts. The old london taxis are quicker to 30mph than a McLaren F1 was, but on the motorway we all know which would be better.FarmerPug wrote:The slow 0-60 time would be offset if it was remapped to 185bhp.
I know what your saying.waue1978 wrote:Don't put too much weight in the 0-60 time. It can be adversely affected by the gearing. You really need to drive both to get an accurate guage of which one feels quick & also be aware of what type of use it will get to judge if it has the performance where it counts. The old london taxis are quicker to 30mph than a McLaren F1 was, but on the motorway we all know which would be better.FarmerPug wrote:The slow 0-60 time would be offset if it was remapped to 185bhp.
Be very careful of what the makers promise both in terms of RPMs at which the top torque appears and of fuel consumption numbers. Of course if you have a good rolling road result then it's OK.Bailes1992 wrote:I know what your saying.waue1978 wrote:Don't put too much weight in the 0-60 time. It can be adversely affected by the gearing. You really need to drive both to get an accurate guage of which one feels quick & also be aware of what type of use it will get to judge if it has the performance where it counts. The old london taxis are quicker to 30mph than a McLaren F1 was, but on the motorway we all know which would be better.FarmerPug wrote:The slow 0-60 time would be offset if it was remapped to 185bhp.
Thats another reason why I fancy the Mondie, 400NM of Torque at 1800rpm! thats DMF mashing good!