Ford confusion

Just your normal general chatting in here..

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
gumby6371
3.0 24v
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Telford

Ford confusion

Post by gumby6371 »

My sister in law has recently bought a a fiesta zetec s 1.6 petrol which is allegedly a 'sport' version. She does like her hot hatches and bought it to replace a Golf GT Sport (diesel)
It is actually a very nice looking car (not my cup of tea) 17" wolfrace alloys, half leather, sporty looking body work etc...
Having a proper nosey at it yesterday and thinking those 205 40 17 directional tyres won't be cheap to replace when something caught my eye....very small front discs and what looked to me like tiny drums on the back....on a sport???
Do ford just fit the bling and leave everything else standard on them?
120bhp on a small car like that will make it perky I would imagine but sporty I don't think so, in fact she did admit her diesel golf was considerably quicker.
Auto trader has them down as sub 10 seconds 0-60 and 120 top end but hot hatch - I don't think so. Personally I wouldn't fancy throwing it into the bends and I would always be worried that the brakes were under sized before I gave it too much right foot.
1996 1.9 TD LX (Gone but not forgotten)
2003 2.2 HDI SE
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Ford confusion

Post by sirwiggum »

The other half had a Fiesta Studio which had a CD player but windy up windows and didn't even have fold down seats (which even the 406 and Accord coupe have!).

At least with rear drums theres no danger of binding rear brakes.
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
User avatar
steve_earwig
Moderator
Posts: 19813
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Jastrebarsko, Croatia http://www.jastrebarsko.hr/lokacija/

Re: Ford confusion

Post by steve_earwig »

Expect a smaller bore master cylinder and/or larger servo. Oh, and lots of brake fade...
Unskilled meddling sin©e 2007

The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again.
User avatar
Welly
The moderator formally known as Welton
Posts: 15033
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: East Midlandfordshire

Re: Ford confusion

Post by Welly »

Most standard brakes are, well, standard. They'll be 'ok' for most uses but will overheat when pushed.

The discs may look small behind 17" wheels but will have been sized based upon the weight of the car etc.

I'm ashamed to admit on a public forum that my car is fitted with Ford Mondeo brakes as standard :cry: :frown: it is something I'm trying to come to terms with but its been a difficult time for me personally.
Cars in my care:
2021 Kia Spottage 1.6 Pez Turbo Dual Clutch Gearbox Trickery
2013 Renner Twingo - donkey work
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Ford confusion

Post by sirwiggum »

Welly wrote:Most standard brakes are, well, standard. They'll be 'ok' for most uses but will overheat when pushed.

The discs may look small behind 17" wheels but will have been sized based upon the weight of the car etc.

I'm ashamed to admit on a public forum that my car is fitted with Ford Mondeo brakes as standard :cry: :frown: it is something I'm trying to come to terms with but its been a difficult time for me personally.
You mean Jaguar brakes surely?

With all the component sharing that goes on, surely brakes are going to be fairly standard across a wide section of vehicles?
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
leestudd30
2.0 Turbo
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:43 am
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire

Re: Ford confusion

Post by leestudd30 »

Looking at Auto Trader too, I can see they are down as 10.2 to 60 and 113 top end, but still not much for a sporty car. My old 94 Corolla with the 4AFE block could do that and that was an incredibly boring car!
1997 2 litre GLX 4dr now dead!
2005 Citroen Xsara Picasso Desire HDi
User avatar
lozz
3.0 24v
Posts: 11908
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: where-ever

Re: Ford confusion

Post by lozz »

sirwiggum wrote:
Welly wrote:Most standard brakes are, well, standard. They'll be 'ok' for most uses but will overheat when pushed.

The discs may look small behind 17" wheels but will have been sized based upon the weight of the car etc.

I'm ashamed to admit on a public forum that my car is fitted with Ford Mondeo brakes as standard :cry: :frown: it is something I'm trying to come to terms with but its been a difficult time for me personally.
You mean Jaguar brakes surely?

With all the component sharing that goes on, surely brakes are going to be fairly standard across a wide section of vehicles?
its an IKEA thing :supafrisk:
3CE96D3752A8A8DC23AA1C4C44BBC7.jpg
User avatar
sirwiggum
3.0 24v
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: out in the Sticks, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Ford confusion

Post by sirwiggum »

hehe very good Lozz :)

If only it was that easy to work on a car.

I was watching the simpsons last night, and Skinners car was a Volvo (looked like a 740), Bart put balloons on the engine and it flew away. Skinner commented that the engine was from Yugoslavia and thats not even a country anymore.
How is that possible?
A bit like when Homers car was wrote off, the man said it was Yugoslavian, but the only car they imported to the US was the Yugo 45.

Anyhoo, Ford are like VW, everything apart from the air in the tyres (13" on steel wheels) is an option. You want brakes? That'll be the Titanium Ghia X brake pack.
1999 Honda Accord Coupe 2.0 Vtec Automatic
Previously 2002 406 HDi 90 Rapier Monaco Blue
Welly wrote:something to do with rubber/splits/bursts/flat/floppy etc
Image
Post Reply