Which d!ck wrote this?

Sonia406 · Post by **Sonia406** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:53 am

THIS

I'd say someone like my ex

Clueless bastard but still had the balls to pipe up with unwanted or unneeded words of unholy crap.

Dick heads

Errrr.... Ok...
Because the 406 is just a KILLER car

Post by **steve_earwig** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:15 am

Whuh?

Some nobody decides they don't like the 406 for no apparent reason, like I should give a crap. Sadly there are some people that think the Internet exists for them to spout garbage and feel a warm glow in their pants. At least it keeps them off the streets.

Sonia406 · Post by **Sonia406** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:34 am

steve_earwig wrote:Whuh? Some nobody decides they don't like the 406 for no apparent reason, like I should give a crap. Sadly there are some people that think the Internet exists for them to spout garbage and feel a warm glow in their pants. At least it keeps them off the streets.

I suppose, but still

lozz · Post by **lozz** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:48 pm

The 406 ain't the best in terms of handling
But for everything else icarnt fault them,

Oh wait. I forgot to add,

Handbrake is shite,

But there's not much else to moan at,

Post by **steve_earwig** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:03 pm

Nobody made a perfect car yet

By the by, this was posted on the Rav forum yesterday http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-c ... -mega-test Oh dear oh dear, the new Rav is right down there with the Flealander, panned by What Car? too apparently. Needless to say they're all spitting blood over it, apart from the guy who's had his engine replaced 3 times under warranty. My heart bleeds

lozz · Post by **lozz** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:12 pm

A lot of people seem to call the ravs but
Idont see out wrong with them
Other than things like bulbs are a pita to change

My mates had ravs for over 2 years now
Very reliable in diesel form. He's tight with money and will forget services
So from what I've seen icarnt fault them,

I might buy one shortly getting fed up with driving low

lozz · Post by **lozz** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:15 pm

[quote="steve_earwig"]Nobody made a perfect car yet

Actually, yes
But that was years ago

Er, Datsun weren't it,

Body wouid rust but engine never died.

Sonia406 · Post by **Sonia406** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:16 pm

lozz wrote:The 406 ain't the best in terms of handling
But for everything else icarnt fault them,

Oh wait. I forgot to add,

Handbrake is shite,

But there's not much else to moan at,

Must admit the hand brake even I have had issues with

Handling I though I thought she was damn spot on

steve_earwig wrote:Nobody made a perfect car yet

By the by, this was posted on the Rav forum yesterday http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-c ... -mega-test Oh dear oh dear, the new Rav is right down there with the Flealander, panned by What Car? too apparently. Needless to say they're all spitting blood over it, apart from the guy who's had his engine replaced 3 times under warranty. My heart bleeds

Nobody made a perfect car? Errr have you forgotten the 205 T16?

Post by **steve_earwig** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:52 pm

Err...

Sonia406 · Post by **Sonia406** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:05 pm

steve_earwig wrote:Err...

YES???????????????

Post by **steve_earwig** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:34 pm

It's subjective innit. To you it's perfect, to me it's too small and I wouldn't feel safe in it.

Sonia406 · Post by **Sonia406** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:40 pm

steve_earwig wrote:It's subjective innit. To you it's perfect, to me it's too small and I wouldn't feel safe in it.

It's the handling and the speed.......... it made that car unique

mjb · Post by **mjb** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:03 pm

Turbochargers make accurate control of the power difficult, and TURBO LAG... 8 normally aspirated cylinders are a must for sonic perfection too - no more, no less.

If I find a wreck of an M5 (E39) for sale cheap, and transplant the good bits (engine, gearbox, LSD, electric toys) into my Touring, THAT will be the perfect car

Why didn't they make an E35 M5 Touring?

The only M5 estates you can get are the horribly dated E34 and some brand new V10 jobbies with auto boxes

Post by **steve_earwig** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:08 pm

N.B. The fuel consumption of any "perfect" car should not be measured in gallons per mile

mjb · Post by **mjb** » Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:25 pm

steve_earwig wrote:N.B. The fuel consumption of any "perfect" car should not be measured in gallons per mile

Pffft! It absolutely should! However, it shouldn't be too painful if you drive carefully... I haven't driven an M5 yet, but I'd be very surprised if I couldn't get over 40mpg on a run

406oc.co.uk

Which d!ck wrote this?

Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?

Re: Which d!ck wrote this?