been thinking about this all day and thought how i can get round, it im gonna spray the white reflector with the same colour as the car and my cousin does vehicel graphics and he has reflective red so was gonna get him to make me a couple of peugeot lions and have 1 either side of the number plate.
what do you reckon? will it work?
damo406 wrote:my cousin does vehicel graphics and he has reflective red so was gonna get him to make me a couple of peugeot lions and have 1 either side of the number plate.
what do you reckon? will it work?
It's personal preferefence mate, but I reckon that'd look pretty naff . How about a long, thin strip of the stuff right along the bottom edge of the bumper? Edit: no scratch that! Reflective tape is not allowed, see here.
Hmmm, so you have to have 2 symmetrically placed. I'd try to get some long thin rectangular ones and fit them on the lip at the bottom of the bumper, either side of the towbar, although practically you want them as close to the corners as possible so that people don't take a corner off your parked car at night.....
Or, get hold of loads of the eyes out of cats eyes.....
Playtime_Fontayne wrote:"Dai Rees Supplier of Fine Automobilia. Established 2007"
think i have found a way round it now it doesnt say anywhere about having a white reflector on the rear as long as you have a red reflector on the rear so i got myself some of these
and gonna stick them on the bottom of the boot lid next to rear lights and i dont think i'll bother spraying the white reflectors.
damo406 wrote:it doesnt say anywhere about having a white reflector on the rear
The MOT site thingy wrote:Information
This inspection applies to: obligatory rear reflectors only. That is, those required by Regulation to be fitted.
Each vehicle is required to be fitted with two reflectors, one on each side fitted symmetrically
Method of Inspection
1. Check that the required amount of reflectors are fitted. 2. Check that the reflectors are
a. facing to the rear b. the correct colour
c. in good working order and clean condition
Reason for rejection
1. There are less than the required amount of reflectors facing to the rear or where two are fitted they are not symmetrical. 2. A reflector
a. not facing the rear b. not red in colour
c. not in good working order or not in clean condition, ie so damaged or deteriorated that its function is impaired
...and apart from that, as has already been mentioned, it's dangerous and could be confusing to other road users.
I think you'd better cover over the white ones mate....
Playtime_Fontayne wrote:"Dai Rees Supplier of Fine Automobilia. Established 2007"
Damo406 wrote:it doesnt say anywhere about having a white reflector on the rear
It does not say anywhere, except in the legislation!!!
Parliament wrote:No vehicle shall be fitted with a lamp which is capable of showing any light to the rear, other than a red light
There is a long list of exceptions, white reflectors on a private car is not in the list.
Parliament also wrote:Material designed primarily to reflect light is, when reflecting light, to be treated for the purposes of these Regulations as showing a light.
So reflectors are lamps for the purposes of the regulations.
Dai, I was going to go with the simple you answer you gave, but then read that MOT site very carefully.
That MOT site talking about reflectors wrote:This inspection applies to: obligatory rear reflectors only. That is, those required by Regulation to be fitted.
Each vehicle is required to be fitted with two reflectors, one on each side fitted symmetrically
Noting that only the obligatory reflectors are tested, and it not saying anthing about additional lighting. I could understand Damo's point.
Remember - it only takes a few inches of water to drown a 406 don't make the same mistake I made! The V6 Exec is no more.
as has already been mentioned, it's dangerous and could be confusing to other road users.
just had a thought, so are chrome lexus lights illegal ? cos when your behind someone with these on the bak lights you can see the white reflection of your head lights? so does that mean i could in theory get away with not covering the white reflector?
damo406 wrote:just had a thought, so are chrome lexus lights illegal ? cos when your behind someone with these on the bak lights you can see the white reflection of your head lights? so does that mean i could in theory get away with not covering the white reflector?
I think it's one of those grey areas. The lexarse lights are manufactured as such but yours will look as though they've had the outer red shell chopped off. As you say I'd either spray the reflectors or dull the surface so they don't reflect
1996 406 1.8LX Got a bad case of hydro lock!
1996 406 Executive 2.0 Turbo XU10J2TE No longer hangin' on in there
1997 Honda CB500V
2003 Volvo V40 1.8 GDi SE killed by a nutter in a beemer 5 series
2008 Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X
"Always look on the bright side of life, dedo, dedo dedodedo"
damo406 wrote:but it still doesnt stop the fact that they reflect white light from the rear just cos they are made that way though?
Would you argue that point with Mr Plod though?
You're not really going to know until you take your car out on a saturday night with the rozzers all over the place.
1996 406 1.8LX Got a bad case of hydro lock!
1996 406 Executive 2.0 Turbo XU10J2TE No longer hangin' on in there
1997 Honda CB500V
2003 Volvo V40 1.8 GDi SE killed by a nutter in a beemer 5 series
2008 Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Titanium X
"Always look on the bright side of life, dedo, dedo dedodedo"